Uncanny X-Force : Archangel and Wolverine secretly assemble a new X-Force Team including Fantomex, Deadpool and Psylocke.
i might do a series called “photoshoots sidney crosby wishes he’d never done” and these potential 90’s sitcom pictures about a dad and his son would be at the top of the list.
I thought of you and where you’d gone
And the world spins madly on.
And…finished. I think that when I do these kinds of paintings in the future, it would be best to have the environment sorted out before adding the figures. However, for something that started out as a throw-away doodle, I’m pretty satisfied.
This piece is…Stunning.
I do what I want
You do not control me!
Can we talk about how much freaking effort it took for that diver to get into all of that gear just to take that stupid picture in the hot tub? You’re all fucking losers and I love you
So photographer David Slater wants Wikipedia to remove a monkey selfie that was taken with his camera. As you can see from this screen shot, Wikipedia says no: the monkey pressed the shutter so it owns the copyright.
We got NPR’s in-house legal counsel, Ashley Messenger, to weigh in. She said:
Traditional interpretation of copyright law is that the person who captured the image owns the copyright. That would be the monkey. The photographer’s best argument is that the monkey took the photo at his direction and therefore it’s work for hire. But that’s not a great argument because it’s not clear the monkey had the intent to work at the direction of the photographer nor is it clear there was “consideration” (value) exchanged for the work. So… It’s definitely an interesting question! Or the photographer could argue that leaving the camera to see what would happen is his work an therefore the monkey’s capture of the image was really the photographer’s art, but that would be a novel approach, to my knowledge.